A fiery Prime Minister’s Questions descended into a shouting match today as the opposition leader accused the Prime Minister of lying and weakness over his government’s refusal to approve new North Sea oil and gas licenses.
.webp)
Sir Keir Starmer erupted in rage during the weekly session, demanding to know why the government would not greenlight the Rosebank and Jackdaw fields. He insisted the Prime Minister had the power to act immediately to boost energy security and lower bills. The clash centered on Britain’s future energy mix and exposed deep divisions over how to handle the ongoing global energy crisis.
The Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, countered that the decision rested by law with the Energy Secretary, calling the opposition’s attack “absolutely ridiculous.” He defended his government’s record, stating that oil and gas would remain part of the UK’s energy supply for years but that the long-term solution was a rapid shift to renewables. He accused the opposition of having no coherent energy or foreign policy.
“HE CAN MAKE THIS DECISION TODAY. HE CAN. HE IS SO WEAK,” Sir Keir shouted across the despatch box, his voice rising in frustration. He accused the Prime Minister of being “pushed around by the energy secretary” and hiding behind legal processes. The Speaker was repeatedly forced to intervene to calm the heated exchange.

Sir Keir presented a broad coalition he claimed supported new drilling, including unions, energy firms like Centrica and Octopus, and even Labour MPs. He quoted a Labour backbencher who warned that “offshoring our carbon emissions… is simply impoverishing our communities.” He contrasted the UK’s stance with that of Norway’s Labour government, which he said drilled 49 wells last year.
“The Norwegian Prime Minister is doing what is right for his country. If only our prime minister would do the same,” Sir Keir declared. He labeled the moratorium on new drilling a “reckless promise” that has become “catastrophic,” citing predictions of a £300 rise in energy bills this July. He argued new licenses would show serious intent to cut costs.

Prime Minister Starmer fired back, linking high energy prices directly to the war in Ukraine and attacking the opposition leader’s stance on the conflict. “She wanted to jump into the war without regard to the consequences… now she’s stranded without a thought through position,” he stated. He positioned his refusal to join the war as a principled stand for de-escalation.
The Prime Minister highlighted government actions to shield the public, including a £100 reduction in household bills next month and a subsequent three-month price cap. He accused the opposition of voting against these measures and of fostering a “broken” welfare system. “They’ve given up being the Labor Party and they’re now just the welfare party,” he charged.

The session underscored a fundamental political divide. The government frames the energy crisis as a geopolitical issue solvable by renewable independence and diplomatic caution. The opposition portrays it as a failure of domestic policy, where leveraging sovereign resources is a straightforward step to economic security.
With experts warning of further bill increases and winter approaching, this explosive debate signals that energy policy will remain a primary battleground. The public clash leaves voters with starkly different visions for the nation’s energy future and economic stability. Today’s confrontation ensures neither side will back down as the pressure on household finances continues to mount.

