You know what Democrats have been saying about President Trump and the Epstein files, right? ‘If you’ve got nothing to hide, why not release them?’ Well, Trump signed legislation to release them, and guess what? He didn’t have anything to hide.
Now, the same analogy can be used against Democrats in California. If they don’t have anything to hide, then why not let the federal government audit the state’s voter registration rolls?
We know the answer, of course, especially now that the spotlight is on California’s ridiculous election system. It takes days for ballots to arrive, and when they do, suddenly, we get surges of ballots for Democrat candidates, never Republicans.
Just look what has happened in the race for Los Angeles mayor:
Lunacy. That kind of ‘math’ just screams fraud. But if there isn’t any – why not prove it? That’s a question a U.S. attorney in California wants answered:
The U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, Bill Essayli, revealed Sunday that state officials are continuing to block a federal audit of the state’s voter rolls, as the office has uncovered multiple policies that have raised concerns about how California administers its elections.
Those policies include allowing first-time voters who are unable to provide a Social Security number or driver’s license to register using alternative forms of identification, including gym membership cards, employer ID cards, credit or debit cards, and prescription drug labels. The state also permits the use of insurance cards, which has drawn additional scrutiny because California provides free health coverage to illegal aliens.
Other policies cited include a failure to promptly remove deceased voters from the voter rolls and lax restrictions on third-party ballot harvesting.
“For over a year, the Department of Justice has been trying to audit California’s voter rolls. Federal law gives the Attorney General the authority to review state voter files and confirm that only eligible U.S. citizens are voting in federal elections,” he wrote on X.
“AAGDhillon sent California a letter explaining our legal authority. California refused to comply, claiming state privacy laws block the review, an argument that does not hold up because those laws don’t apply to the federal government in this context,” he said, a reference to Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Harmeet Dhillon.
We’ve sued California in federal court, and the case is before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals,” Essayli went on.
“If California genuinely wants voters to trust its elections, it should open its records, not fight to keep them closed,” he added. “What are they afraid of?”
His statement comes after his office previously announced a much-needed investigation into California’s elections.
Why is he investigating? Oh, I don’t know…maybe this is why:
It’s high time we got some answers from Democrats who demand transparency from everyone else.
